Wednesday 2 May 2012


1. Define the 17th century 'Scientific Revolution', and say how it changed European thought and world view. 
According to Chegg.com the scientific revolution refers to the rapid advances to the European scientific, mathematical and political thought that was based on a new philosophy and faith progress that defined Europe in the 16th and 17th century. It came out of the Renaissance period when the universe was questioned by scientists and the belief process was changed.

2. Give examples of how we can we still see evidence of the 'Scientific Revolution' in the world today.
Today the scientific revolution is still evident as we are continuously seeing 'new' or 'modern' thing, such as technology. Sientific revolution has become very common with new technology such as iphones and new cars etc. i believe that the scientific revolution will never come to an end as new ideas are always evolving and improvements are forever taking place. If they never started the scientific revolution then we would not be where we are today and we would not hold such a promising future. 

Research Pipilotti Rist's video installations to answer the following;

3. From your research, do you think that the contemporary art world values art work
that uses new media/technology over traditional media?
While researching Pipilotti Rist's video installations i found that most people are adapting to the change in the media with a positive outlook. On one blog, the art blog, the have said 'new media is a young artform, but its fresh and engaging, and being experimental it lacka the pomposity that often is attached to traditional art forms.'  here the art blog is for traditional media giving the explanation that it is new and exciting being different from the traditional art forms we are now used to. Looking at comments on the you tube video of her work 'ever is all over' most comments are arguing that her work is 'Beautiful. Fantastic' and ' I love love love love her work' all positive comments giving her work hype. But there are still the odd people that are against the change in the art world saying that she is 'sick minded' and has 'disturbed and traumatized' her viewers. 

4. How has Pipilotti Rist used new media/technology to enhance the audience's experience of her work.
On the web site sport your food.com they have said, 'in these works provocation is a constant and it is created by a playful mix of fantasy and real life where the ongoing movement of the images gives life to a transformation of the subjects, of familiar spaces translated in mesmerizing kaleidoscopes.For the Swiss artist the video images are the projections of emotions and desires, a new form of organic life that will be perceived by every single sense the audience has.' here it explains that Rist's embraces the audience by using spaces that are familiar and not out of the ordinary so you are able to relate to the situation and out yourself in the space easily. She also uses calming music, especially in the video clip Ever is all Over, it is a slow calming relaxing song which tends to mesmerize the audience so they are almost no longer in control of their oen fellings and they are forced to be apart of the video. I felt this when watching Ever is all Over i was unable to stop it, i watched it to the end, even though i wasn't hugely enjoying it, i was just following it until the end. 

5. Comment on how the installation, sound and scale of 'Ever is Over All' (1997) could impact on the audience's experience of the work.
In the clip Ever i all Over the music is very romantic and happy which contrasts to some of what is happening in the clip, the violence of smashing car windows. The music creates a fantasy world which the lady smashing the windows appears to be caught up in, she is oblivious to the fact that she is smashing windows and it to caught up in the music and fantasy of it all. Her complete outfit, the pretty dress and her happiness also gives this feeling to me. The music impacts the audience as i think that it puts the viewers in the same state of mind as the lady walking down the street, the also get engaged into the fantasy land and no longer have a say but they just follow the video.
 
6. Comment on the notion of 'reason' within the content of the video. Is the woman's behaviour reasonable or unreasonable?
The behavior of the woman is strange to me, it was unexpected that with the romantic music a pretty women in a dress walking down a street carrying a flower would out of the blue strike at a car with the flower and smash the window. It was a shock for me to see this and confused me, i thought it was unreasonable. While watching the video there did not seem to be a good enough reason to just randomly break parked cars windows. When the female police officer then walks behind the lady you expect an arrest or at least a form of constraint to stop the ladies behavior but nothing but a wave from the officer makes the behavior of the women almost seem as if it is reasonable or else the officer would have done otherwise. It is a split view, the audience may seem her behavior to be unreasonable but if an authority doesn't seem to mind this behavior it makes you re think, maybe it wasn't unreasonable?

7. Comment on your 'reading' (understanding) of the work by discussion the aesthetic (look), experience and the ideologies (ideas, theories) of the work.
My understanding of the work is that is shows a feminist view using romantic music and a pretty lady in a dress , which contrasts with the violence used when smashing the windows. The look of the video is interesting with the two different videos happening in one, the main video of the lady and the side video of the close-up of the flowers, this makes the video interesting and exciting you can flick between the two videos. The idea's behind the work as i said before is the feminist views. Also another theory could be to make the viewer feel as if they are apart of the video to make the experienced shared between the viewers and the actress in the video. I found the video very interesting and excitingly different. I had not experienced an art video like this before and it was very enjoyable for me. 
 


http://www.theartblog.org/2012/02/new-media-art-white-hot-gold-at-murray-state/
http://www.chegg.com/
http://www.sportyourfood.com/en/Parasimpatico.-The-Nicola-Trussardi-Foudation-presents-Pipilotti-Rist/ 

4 comments:

  1. Hi Alex,

    I like the your opinion in question number two, about how our world is constantly changing and improving, with new technology springing up everywhere. This is definetly evidence of the Sciecntific Revolution. I think we see The Scientific Revolution in the way people think nowadays, everyone is independent and entitled to their own opinion not being governed by religion or a church.

    I like your comment in question seven too, about how you found the video to be "excitingly different". For me I felt that aesthetically Rist's video installations are dynamic, and I loved her use of bright colours. The scale of her video installations puts the subject in your face they are confrontational. And I found this piece of information to be very insightful.. It is said that her video represent the "birth of a sophisticated visual language, expressing the direct, realistic senses of the MTV generation."

    Thanks for your post I really enjoyed reading your viewpoint.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Alex.

    Good work, your opinions are very strong. I agree with question number two. In todays society new things are always being invented and later on upgraded such as the iphone idea. They are onto their 4th iphone now and I am sure there are many more to come.
    I like how you said without the "scientific revolution" we would not have such a promising future ahead of us. I agree, years ago they did not have high tech technology as we have, such as computers and the internet. Without the idea of computers we would not be as knowledgable on the news,weather or even the planet.

    good work alex. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. thats my comment above by the way. I didnt realize my name was that, so I just changed it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Alex!
    Great post by the way! I liked reading the questions about your opinion, and I'm glad that you picked up on what she was wearing for your answer to question five! I totally forgot to consider that! I enjoyed your answer to question seven and I've read a couple similar ones, yours stood out though as you were very descriptive of the floral patterns etc, things I wasn't able to pick up on from watching the video. Great post though Alex!

    ReplyDelete